She Survived

This past Sunday morning, I presented a sermon on what happens when a woman exercises her so-called "right to choose" (a.k.a. abortion, a.k.a. infanticide). I have already received quite a number of requests for a copy of that sermon on DVD -- evidence that people care about this issue (as they should).

As a follow-up to that study, I wanted to make you aware of a certain woman's story by providing a link to a video of her recent appearance on a television program.

The biological mother of Gianna Jessen (seen at right) decided to have a saline abortion procedure performed seven and one-half months into her pregnancy...thus exercising her "right." For 18 hours, little Gianna was literally burned with this poison INTENTIONALLY, until her mother ACCIDENTALLY went into labor, delivering a two-pound LIVING baby girl. Now obviously, this story has a happy ending since you can see her photo at 31 years of age; but multiplied millions of unborn boys and girls are not so fortunate.

Fortunately for little two-pound Gianna, the doctor who had performed this despicable act was not present when she was born. The nurse on duty called an ambulance and had little Gianna rushed to the hospital. Gianna obviously survived and is doing well, but she was stricken with cerebral palsy. By the way, if you've never seen a photo of the outcome of a saline abortion, I would encourage you do do an internet search. You will never feel the same about this horrible, disgusting act of murder again -- even if you already are opposed to it. I will warn you, though, it is extremely disturbing.

I have posted the video of Gianna on Hannity & Colmes below. The video obviously has some political discussion, and as I said Sunday, some of that is unavoidable when we're talking about this issue. I make no apologies for including this video. If you are perceptive enough to surmise who I may cast my vote for this November, so be it; but I will not tell you for whom you should vote. I am not a political commentator, and will therefore stay out of politics as much as is possible (at least in a religiously oriented forum such as this).

I am, however, passionate about speaking for the 40-million plus boys and girls who have no voice due to the fact that they have already been murdered. They were murdered by mothers who have simply been lied to and convinced this is a normal medical procedure they have every right to undergo. I simply cannot be silent on this matter, and I personally cannot in, good conscience, lend any support of ANY kind to someone who is responsible for perpetuating this atrocity. But that's just me....and you are welcome to take that for what it may be worth.

God will avenge the blood of the innocent, and they don't get more innocent than little baby boys and girls. What are we going to do about this? What are YOU going to do about this? Do you support "a woman's right to choose," or a baby's right to live?? That is the only question that really matters here.

Jenna's personal website can be found at BornAliveTruth.com

Here, now, is the video...

r2

In The Out & Out The In

Upon one of my recent trips to the local Target here in the bustling metropolis that is Mechanicsville, I observed a most curious sight. As I walked toward the front of the store from the parking lot, I noticed two families. One was entering the store, and the other was exiting store at precisely the same time. What's so unusual about that? Nothing at all...except for this: The family entering the store was walking through the doors clearly labeled "EXIT," and the family leaving the store was walking through the doors clearly labeled "ENTER."

I had to chuckle at this sight. Maybe it's just the mind of a preacher, but the statement made by the Lord to his people in the book of Isaiah immediately came to mind:

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
Isaiah 5:20, ESV

Now, please do not misunderstand my point here. I am not suggesting these families have subjected themselves to the wrath of God for entering and exiting through the proper doors (though they may have to answer to Target's red-clad security team). My point here is that this scene was a visual representation of what God describes here in the message of the prophet Isaiah.

When the murder of precious unborn boys and girls is lauded as "freedom" or as "a woman's right to choose," that is the very essence of calling evil good.

When teenagers are given contraceptives by their schools (or even their parents, for that matter), this is the epitome of putting darkness for light.

When judges who were appointed to uphold laws and morality deem marriage between persons of the same sex to be wholesome and legal, this is very much a case of putting bitter for sweet.

Do yourself a favor and read through the rest of the fifth chapter of Isaiah and notice how the Lord regards such blatant disregard for His law. It's rather obvious at this point that the laws of this once great nation are being chiseled away little by little by our lawmakers and judges. God's laws, however, have been "firmly fixed in the heavens" (Psalm 119:89). What God has ordained as law will always remain law.

May we never be guilty of calling "evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!"

r2

"I Can't See Any Harm In It"

Sometimes, we cannot see the harm in something simply because we have not bothered to actually look for it. Consider these guidelines when determining whether an action is right or wrong:

1. The Personal Test: will doing this make me a better or worse Christian?
2. The Social Test: will doing it influence others to be better or worse Christians?
3. The Practical Test: will the results of my doing it be desirable?
4. The Universal Test: if everyone should do this, would it enhance or degrade society?
5. The Scriptural Test: does the Bible endorse it or is it forbidden -- even implied as wrong -- by the word of God?
6. The Stewardship Test: will my doing this constitute a waste of talent God gave me?
7. The Character Test: what will be the influence of my moral & spiritual stamina?
8. The Family Test: will it bring discredit & dishonor to my family, and will it embarrass them?
9. The Publicity Test: would I be willing for friends, fellow Christians, the elders, and the preacher to know about it?
10. The Common Sense Test: does it agree with plain, everyday, ordinary common sense?
11. The Fairness Test: is it honest, and it is practicing the "Golden Rule"?
12. The Problem Test: is it potentially harmful to me and / or others?

No matter what "it" may be, if "it' fails even one of these tests, we ought to be wise enough to see the harm therein. On such a case, abstinence is the only policy.

Test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.
1 Thessalonians 5:21-22, ESV

r2

The New Slavery?

This morning's edition of NBC's Today show featured an interview with V. Gene Robinson, the bishop of the Diocese of New Hampshire in the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (better known as simply the "Episcopal Church"). You may remember the copious amounts of air time his story received back in 2003 when he was elected to this position. The controversy surrounded his open admissions of homosexual behavior.

In the years that followed these events, numerous congregations within the Episcopal denomination have broken their ties with the governing body and have since aligned themselves with other groups. The reason for Mr. Robinson's appearance on the Today show was the release of his new book, In The Eye Of The Storm: Swept To The Center By God. Robinson also appeared in the film, For The Bible Tells Me So, a documentary promoted at the 2007 Sundance Film Festival (scroll to the bottom of this post and click on the video box to see the trailer for this film).

While listening to the interview this morning, I took a pen and a sheet of paper and jotted down a few of the more notable statements made by Mr. Robinson. Here are just a few:

• Robinson compared himself to the prophets of the Bible, citing the persecution he feels.
• He likened the "discrimination" against gays to the subjugation of women and slavery.
• Mr. Robinson said he knows many people who are "unashamedly gay and unashamedly Christian."
• He said there is a need to "re-interpret the Scriptures."
• Robinson claims that God has called him into the lifestyle of homosexuality so that he can fulfill the role he is now playing.

Where does one begin in answering these statements? Let's briefly take them one by one, shall we?

• The prophets of the Bible were persecuted for their unwavering support and defense of God's word; Mr. Robinson is being criticized for his blatant disregard for that same word.

• The opposition Mr. Robinson receives from Bible believers is not to be compared with social disasters like slavery and racism. Individuals who supported slavery in the past, and individuals who harbor racist attitudes today violate the word of God in so doing. Those who lovingly teach the truth about the sin of homosexuality as it is revealed in Scripture are following in the footsteps of the Lord. Does anyone else find Mr. Robinson's comparison to slavery offensive?

• There is no such thing as a homosexual Christian. The two terms contradict one another. A Christian is one who follows the teachings and example of Jesus Christ. If there are "gay Christians," as Mr. Robinson claims, there must also be adulterous Christians, fornicator Christians, thief Christians, and the like. The truth of the matter is that no man or woman who continues in a lifestyle of sin and rebellion to God's word will inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-10).

• The need is not in "re-interpreting the Scriptures." The need is for more people to show genuine love for Christ by humbly obeying Him (John 14:15).

• God does not call men to a lifestyle of sin. He does not compel anyone to practice that which will leave their soul in peril. On the contrary, the Lord calls men out of darkness and into the light of truth by the gospel (2 Thessalonians 2:14).

It should be noted that we should never support any effort that would attack another human being, be it by words or physical violence. Anyone who spews venomous, hateful words in the direction of another also violates the law of God.

This being said, it is truly unfortunate that the propaganda machine used by many so-called "gay rights" groups paints with such a broad brush. Those of us who defend the truth and purity if the Bible and its teachings on homosexuality are often lumped in with the screaming, red-faced radicals hurling profanity-laced insults. Truly unfortunate.

It can only be hoped that those who have honest and sincere hearts can step back from the useless political debates to see the difference between those who hate homosexuals and those who love them enough to tell the truth. Gene Robinson would have you believe a loving attitude and teaching the sinfulness of homosexuality are mutually exclusive. That's a claim that will sell books...maybe even get him on a bestseller's list or two. But it is a claim that cannot be backed up by the word of God.

Let's speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15).

r2

364 Days To Go!

The countdown is on: only 364 more days until the deadline for filing your 2008 tax return!

As a kid, April 15th was just another day for me. Then came high school and college where I got a little taste of what it meant to pay income tax (only to get it all back at a later date). Once adulthood rolled around, I understood all too well the groans of dread and despair.

I found a fascinating collection of little known facts concerning the history of taxes, both around the world and in the United States. Some of these are amusing, but I must warn you, others may make you want to pull your hair out!

Did you know...

• The first record of tax collectors were depicted in ancient Egyptian tomb paintings from around 2000 B.C.
• Roman Emperor, Nero, levied many odd taxes including one on urine (Romans collected urine from public latrines to be used for tanning leather).
• In A.D. 1404, the British Parliament passed the world's first income tax. It was so hated that after its repeal, all records thereof were burned.
• In order to westernize Russia, Peter the Great imposed a tax on beards -- which he considered a "ridiculous ornament."
• During the French Revolution, King Louis XVI's tax collectors were rounded up and beheaded on the guillotine.
• In 1792, the U.S. imposed a "sin tax" on whiskey, sparking the "Whiskey Rebellion."
• To finance the civil war, the U.S. Congress instituted the first income tax in 1862. It was meant to be temporary.
• In 1943, the withholding tax on wages was introduced. Within two years, the IRS's earnings went from $60 million to $43 billion!
• The Declaration of Independence has 1,337 words -- the Bible has 773,00 words -- today's tax laws top 7-million words.
• In 2005, Americans worked 70 days just to pay off federal taxes, and another 37 days for local taxes.
• Each year, the IRS prints nearly 8-billion pages of forms and instructions. That's enough to wrap the earth 28 times.
• An estimated 300,000 trees are cut down each year for IRS forms. That number is shrinking due to e-filing.
• With 114,000 employees, the IRS is twice the size of the CIA and five times as big as the FBI.

At this point, this could very easily devolve into a political rant regarding the immense sums of taxpayer money wasted by the U.S. government. However, this is not a political blog. What can we glean from this spiritually?

Keep in mind the Roman government of Jesus' day taxed its own citizens heavily. No doubt, first century Christians did not agree with much of what was being done with their hard-earned money. Tax collectors were despised more in those days than any IRS agent in our own. Nonetheless, what did Christ teach in regard to paying taxes?

And they sent to him some of the Pharisees and some of the Herodians, to trap him in his talk. And they came and said to him, "Teacher, we know that you are true and do not care about anyone's opinion. For you are not swayed by appearances, but truly teach the way of God. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not? Should we pay them, or should we not?" But, knowing their hypocrisy, he said to them, "Why put me to the test? Bring me a denarius and let me look at it." And they brought one. And he said to them, "Whose likeness and inscription is this?" They said to him, "Caesar's." Jesus said to them, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marveled at him.
Mark 12:13-17, ESV

Believe me...I know vitamins I,R, and S can be bitter pills to swallow. But the teaching of our Lord in this matter is clear. The disciples of Jesus are to abide by the system of taxation imposed by the nation in which they live. Moreover, we are to do so honestly.

r2

Job's Answer To The "Pro-Choice" Folks

For 35 years, masses of men and women have sought to appease their consciences with faulty conjecture, namely that an unborn child does not constitute human life. One need look no further than their flaccid attempts at re-defining terms. The unborn boy or girl has become "pregnancy tissue."

Some say the child is not "human" until the second trimester of a mother's pregnancy; others insist this change takes place some time in the third trimester. Still others are adamant in their belief that a child is not fully human until it has been delivered and taken his or her first breath.

But why stop there? Some "ethicists" have been known to say killing a living, breathing infant outside the mother's womb is not immoral or unethical. Peter Singer, the well-known professor of bioethics at Princeton University made a sickening statement in a 1999 lecture. The following is an excerpt from Paul Zielbauer's article that appeared in the October 13, 1999 edition of The New York Times:


''I do not think it is always wrong to kill an innocent human being,'' Professor Singer told the rapt audience in Harold Helm Auditorium. ''Simply killing an infant is never equivalent to killing a person.''


A statement like this may surprise you...but it shouldn't. Mt. Singer's extreme views on this issue are merely the logical end to that which many of our neighbors, friends, and family have been convinced -- namely that it is the mark of compassion to support "a woman's right to choose."

Now that we have heard from Peter Singer, perhaps we should allow the Lord our God (the Creator and Judge of all mankind) to have a word:

Did not he [God] who made me in the womb make him [servant]? And did not one [God] fashion us in the womb?
Job 31:15, ESV

God uses the pen of Job to assure us that he [God] makes us in his own image by placing a living spirit within us as he shapes us in our mothers' wombs!

Friend, it's past time to let the politicians and judges who are leading our morally decaying nation into the abyss that we will no longer stand by and watch millions of innocent infant boys and girls be legally butchered (literally)! When we stand in judgment before the same God who hates the shedding of innocent blood (Proverbs 6:16-17), how will we rationalize casting our votes for men and women we knew would perpetuate this brutal and heartless sin?

r2

Sinning With The Stars

Sometimes, we have to say things even though we know they will be looked upon as extremely unpopular.

At the risk of being looked upon as an "old fuddy-duddy" (even though I'm only 29 years old), I hope you will take a moment to consider why God's people should not be viewers of television programs that glorify immodesty and immoral sexuality such as ABC's Dancing With The Stars.

I am well aware of the fact that Dancing With The Stars is one of the most popular programs on television at the time of this writing. I am also aware of the fact that some men and women within the body of Christ are regular viewers. Without beating around the bush, I will say this bluntly and succinctly: Watching Dancing With The Stars is wholly inconsistent with Christian character.

Could we single out other shows and say the same? Of course. However, looking at this show is particularly important because it so clearly illustrates the problem with modern dancing. This program should be a reminder to Christian parents and teenagers in regard to school sponsored dances, such as proms and homecomings.

Someone might ask, "Well, how can you know it's bad if you don't even watch it?" This hearkens back to the age-old, "don't knock it 'til you've tried it" argument, which of course is an argument that holds no water and is completely illogical.

Nonetheless, it is only fair to address such a question. One need only be watching some other program on ABC (such as college football) to see the frequently-run promotions of Dancing With The Stars, and if the full hour of each episode contained only that which is included in these 30-second spots, that would be sufficient to consider such a program unsuitable for viewing. In truth, however, it does not take a nuclear scientist to accurately conclude that a considerable portion of the program is devoted to sexual movements by scantily clad contestants. Incidentally, there is no way I could have used 90% of the photos I came across in trying to find one to fit this article. Some of the costumes I saw were essentially lingerie, and the poses and action shots would warrant a guaranteed "R" rating by the Motion Picture Association of America.

In doing a bit of research, I have found what people of the world who would consider virtually nothing on T.V. and in the movies to be immoral are saying about Dancing With The Stars. I read a piece earlier today from the Los Angeles Times that spoke of the obvious encouragement the contestants are receiving to "bring out the sexy" in their dance routines. That's the Los Angeles Times, folks. Clearly, they do not see any harm in such an emphasis. What about God's people?

The Bible classifies "lewdness" as one of the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:19-21). God has made this fact abundantly clear...that those who practice lewdness will not inherit the kingdom of God. This is true of those who willingly view lewd behavior as much as it is those who exhibit that sexually suggestive behavior.

If you are a viewer of Dancing With The Stars, it may be true that you watch primarily because you like to watch talented people, because you like certain "stars," or for any other number of reasons. But if you wear the name of Christ, I would challenge you to step back and make an honest assessment of this program, as well as any other. We (myself included) have become far too comfortable in letting the FCC regulate what comes into our living rooms instead of the word of God.

My friend, the FCC is not going to be there to plead your case as you stand before God in judgment. If you would be ashamed to admit you watch some T.V. show to your brothers and sisters in the church, that is all you need to know. However, even if we would unabashedly proclaim our loyal viewer status, we still need to reflect on how these shows are hindering or helping our goal of attaining a heavenly reward.

Thanks for reading this humble treatise. I hope it will be an encouragement toward faithfulness for all of us.

r2

Pummeled By Pickles

For some of you "pickle haters" out there, this story may be too much for you to read. For those of us who enjoy a good pickle (such as myself), this report out of Niles, Michigan will be good for a laugh. For those of you who despise pickles to their very core -- if they had a core -- this may disturb you.

Two friends became involved in an altercation that will go down in the court logs as one of the strangest ever. Jody Lee complained to friend Bobby Lee Bolen when Bolen went to Lee's refrigerator and began eating pickles. Lee told Bolen that he could not afford to feed everyone. Bolen proceeded to storm out of the house, only to return moments later. He grabbed two more pickles and threw them at Lee, yelling something to the effect of, "Here are your pickles!" (edited for profanity).

Bolen was arrested and imprisoned for 54 days on charges of assault......with pickles. If only he had used the sweet kind. Surprisingly, alcohol was involved (tongue firmly implanted in cheek).

I know for some of you, being attacked with pickles would be a fate worse than death. How silly, though, is the behavior of Mr. Bolen? Perhaps we understand even more fully in cases such as this what God meant when he breathed the following words through the writing of Solomon:

Wine is a mocker, strong drink is a brawler, and whoever is led astray by it is not wise.
Proverbs 20:1, NKJV

Be sober friend -- both in mind and in body -- and your regrets will be far fewer.

r2

Coming Clean

You may have heard the news that broke yesterday about track and field legend, Marion Jones. Ms. Jones has finally admitted to using performance enhancing drugs prior to her truly golden performance (three gold medals, five medals in all) at the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games.

For several years, Jones has adamantly denied using such substances. In 2004, she held a public press conference in which she strongly urged her fans and the public to trust her word.

The news of her admission yesterday makes every one of her denials and appeals to the public for trust seem exceedingly shallow and blatantly dishonest. To make matters worse, Marion is now claiming she must have been given these substances against her will and without her knowledge. She claims the drugs must have been contained within what she thought was merely flax seed oil.

But this is hardly a new song. Over the past few years with the increasing steroids in sports scandals, several athletes have used the same unlikely, and quite frankly, unbelievable excuse. For an elite athlete to claim that he or she does not meticulously monitor what goes into the body that provides their livelihood is simply inexplicable.

My family lived in Southern California during the early 1990's during part of my middle and high school years. During that time, my dad and I attended a high school girls' basketball game in which Marion Jones was playing. She was one of the most gifted and dominant athletes I have seen in any sport at any level. Marion went on to star as the University of North Carolina's point guard, leading that team to a National Championship during her freshman season. Of course, her track and field accomplishments at the highest level speak for themselves.

The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a fleeting vapor and snare of death.

Proverbs 21:6, ESV

What is most sad about this story is Jones' lack of honesty. For her fans (like me) and those who admired her talent and work ethic, the tainted shadow she now casts on the sports world is bad enough; but to add to that blatant dishonesty and outright lack of regard for the justice system merely pour salt in the "open wound."

Could you estimate the number of lies that have been told by human beings throughout the history of the world? Do we even have a number that goes so high? Now, how many situations and lives have been improved by all those lies? Not a single one. Lives are ruined and trust vanishes when lies are told.My friend, be resolved to always tell the truth, no matter what!

Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who act faithfully are his delight.

Proverbs 21:6, ESV

Don't Adjust Your Computer Screen...

Did we really need another reason to avoid Amsterdam? The following story out of the Netherlands' most recognizable city is a genuine "head-scratcher."

After a long day of hunting, there's nothing like wrapping your paw around a cold bottle of beer. So Terrie Berenden, a pet shop owner in the Southern Dutch town of Zelhem, created a beer for her Weimeraners made from beef extract and malt.

"Once a year we go to Austria to hunt with our dogs, and at the end of the day we sit on the veranda and drink a beer. So we thought, my dog also has earned it," she said.

Berenden consigned a local brewery to make and bottle the nonalcoholic beer, branded and Kwispelbier. It was introduced to the market last week and advertised as "a beer for your best friend."

"Kwispel" is the Dutch word for wagging a tail.

The beer is fit for human consumption, Berenden said. But at euro1.65 ($2.14) per bottle, it's about four times more expensive than a Heineken.

Yes, this is a real story!

A beverage responsible for ruining a countless number of men, women, and families appears poised to contribute the downfall of the canine species. As the story says, this this is a non-alcoholic beverage......for now. I suppose it won't be long until we hear barks and growls from all over Europe demanding the full fermented version.

I can see it now.....an inebriated Dachshund is beaten to death after he charges a 100-pound Rottweiler due to the fact that he didn't like his "tone" of barking. A once respected Dalmatian loses his job at the fire station because he could not show up for work on time without a hangover. A black Lab seeing eye dog leads his handler into oncoming traffic after a late night at Fido's Tavern.

Ridiculous? Sure. That's the point. Yet, is it really any more ridiculous than succumbing to the manifold dangers of strong drink? Study the text of the Bible on this subject and you will be presented with a crystal clear picture of shattered lives, dangerous situations, and a condemned soul. The Bible says:

Wine is a mocker, strong drink a brawler, and whoever is led astray by it is not wise.
Proverbs 20:1, ESV

Organizations such as P.E.T.A. and the A.S.P.C.A. (the latter of which I am a
big fan) would be "out for blood" if someone were to coax an animal to ingest an intoxicating substance such as alcohol........and rightly so! How strange, then, is our society's affinity for glamorizing the alcohol industry? Strange indeed. Personally, I wouldn't pour anything down my own throat that I would refuse to allow my canine sons (Angus and Louis) to drink!!

r2